<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anthony Shapley &#187; Marketing Archives  &#8211; Anthony Shapley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk/tag/internet-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation &#38; Pay Per Click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Crazy day for an SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk/crazy-day-for-an-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk/crazy-day-for-an-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk/?p=1525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The launch of inlinks.com has had Internet Marketers, SEO&#8217;s and Search Engine employees (Matt Cutts) debatingÂ battling from all sides. Its been really interesting reading all the feedback and points of view from all the biggest names in the industry.
My thought is that  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The launch of inlinks.com has had Internet Marketers, SEO&#8217;s and Search Engine employees (Matt Cutts) <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">debating</span>Â battling from all sides. Its been really interesting reading all the feedback and points of view from all the biggest names in the industry.</p>
<p>My thought is that Google is becoming a bit too big for there boots. Matt Cutts claims (on Shoemoney&#8217;s blog) that Google have technology that can detect paid links, regardless of whether they are nofollowed or not. If this is the case then there should be no issue because we&#8217;re not going to influence the algorithm. Does anyone else smell bullshit?</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t normally link off to loads of sites but this makes for some interesting reading..</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Permanent Link to Does Google REALLY Want To Go Down This FTC Route" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.shoemoney.com/2008/11/19/does-google-really-want-to-go-down-this-ftc-route/" target="_blank">Does Google REALLY Want To Go Down This FTC Route</a></li>
<li><a title="Permanent Link to Gala Bingo and Inlinks" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/gala-bingo-and-inlinks.html" target="_blank">Gala Bingo and Inlinks</a></li>
<li><a title="Insidious New SEO Ad Product Will Be Hard For Google To Detect (Updated With Google Response)" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/insidious-new-seo-ad-product-will-be-hard-for-google-to-detect/" target="_blank">Insidious New SEO Ad Product Will Be Hard For Google To Detect (Updated With Google Response)</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk/crazy-day-for-an-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sandbox</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk/google-sandbox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk/google-sandbox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google sandbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyshapley.co.uk/blog/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well as you know Iâ€™ve been online for sometime, I have recently been reading up on this â€œGoogle Sandbox Theoryâ€. I will try to explain this as shortly as possible, no one enjoys long drawn out posts. Anyway enough waffle (which Iâ€™m  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as you know Iâ€™ve been online for sometime, I have recently been reading up on this â€œGoogle Sandbox Theoryâ€. I will try to explain this as shortly as possible, no one enjoys long drawn out posts. Anyway enough waffle (which Iâ€™m so good at!).</p>
<p><strong>Two Theories</strong></p>
<p>All new sites Submitted to Google are now placed in a theoretical â€œSandboxâ€ away from the real world really. This period of time used to determine Spammy sites from the ones with unique content. Thus preventing Spammy sites getting good SERPS.</p>
<p>The second idea is that this actually has absolutely nothing to do with the physical site, rather the backlinks are only given partial credit for a probation period. Preventing sites shooting up the SERPS.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong> is that Google are making an attempt to filter out spammy websites and are also as an affect preventing new websites establishing well in there SERPS for a certain amount of time. This may even be linked to a level of backlinks reached. Any thoughts/comments would be good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anthonyshapley.co.uk/google-sandbox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

